EventXGames
Back to Blog
13 min read

What Toddlers Teach Us About Customer Attention (Hint: It's Not About Being Loud)

Toddler attention patterns reveal fundamental truths about human psychology that most marketers ignore. The brands winning attention aren't the loudest ones. They're the ones who understand novelty, repetition, and cognitive engagement.

Ash Rahman

Ash Rahman

founder, eventXgames 🎮 crafting engaging branded games and playables for events, campaigns, and iGaming platforms 👨‍🚀 infj-t

#psychology#attention#marketing#behavior

What Toddlers Teach Us About Customer Attention (Hint: It's Not About Being Loud)

Watch a toddler with a new toy. They're completely absorbed. Every feature gets explored. They turn it over, shake it, test it in ways you never imagined.

Ten minutes later? The toy is abandoned. They're now fascinated by the cardboard box it came in.

Your customers' attention works exactly the same way. And most marketing completely misunderstands it.

Developmental psychologists have spent decades studying what captures and holds toddler attention. The findings reveal fundamental truths about human attention that don't change as we age. We just get better at hiding it.

Companies spending millions on "attention metrics" could learn more from watching a three-year-old for an hour than from another marketing analytics dashboard.

The Novelty-Habituation Cycle

Toddlers teach us the most important lesson about attention: novelty captures it, habituation kills it.

How Toddler Attention Works

Researchers studying infant and toddler attention have mapped a consistent cycle:

Phase 1: Orientation (2-3 seconds)
Something new enters their field of awareness. Their attention involuntarily orients toward it. This is automatic, not chosen. The brain is wired to notice novelty because novel things might be threats or opportunities.

Phase 2: Investigation (30 seconds to 3 minutes)
If the novel thing seems safe and interesting, they investigate. They touch it, manipulate it, test its properties. This is active attention. They're building a mental model of what this thing is and does.

Phase 3: Habituation (3-10 minutes)
As they understand the object, it becomes less interesting. The mental model is complete. There's nothing new to learn. Attention drifts. They're now habituated.

Phase 4: Abandonment (instant)
The moment something newer appears, attention shifts completely. The previous toy might as well not exist.

Here's what matters: adult attention follows the exact same cycle. We just pretend it doesn't.

Your Customers Are Habituated to You

Most marketing lives in Phase 3. Your audience has seen your brand. They've investigated enough to categorize you. Now they're habituated. Your ads don't capture attention anymore because there's nothing novel about them.

The Data:

Marketing scientists at the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute tracked attention to brand messaging over time. They found:

  • First exposure: 78% attention capture rate
  • Second exposure: 64% attention capture
  • Third exposure: 41% attention capture
  • Fourth+ exposure: 12-18% attention capture (and declining)

This is habituation playing out. The fourth time someone sees your ad, it might as well be invisible. Their brain has categorized it as "known entity, no new information" and filters it out.

This is why brand refresh campaigns work. Not because the new logo is "better," but because it's novel. It breaks habituation and forces attention phase restart.

The Interactivity Principle

Toddlers teach us something else: passive watching loses to active involvement.

The Experiment That Changes Everything

Researchers showed toddlers two types of content:

  • Passive content: Animated videos designed for children
  • Interactive content: Toys that responded to their actions

They measured engagement duration.

Results:

  • Passive content: average attention span 4.2 minutes
  • Interactive content: average attention span 14.7 minutes

But here's the key finding: interactivity didn't need to be complex. A ball that rolled when pushed kept attention longer than a sophisticated video. The interaction was the engagement mechanism, not the complexity of the object.

How This Applies to Marketing

Most digital marketing is passive. Customers scroll past your content. They watch your video (maybe). They read your copy (barely). You're asking them to consume, not interact.

The brands winning attention are building interaction into every touchpoint.

Real examples:

Passive approach (common):
Email with product announcement. Customer reads (or doesn't). No response required.
Average engagement: 2.3 seconds
Conversion rate: 1.2%

Interactive approach (uncommon):
Email with embedded quiz: "Which plan matches your needs?" Customer clicks through 3 questions to get personalized recommendation.
Average engagement: 47 seconds
Conversion rate: 8.7%

The interactive version doesn't have better copy or design. It has a mechanism that requires customer action. That action creates engagement, which creates attention, which creates conversion.

The Minimum Viable Interaction

You don't need complex interactivity. You need any interactivity.

Buttons that collapse/expand sections. Calculators that show ROI based on inputs. Quizzes that reveal recommendations. Sliders that update previews. Comparisons where customers toggle features on and off.

Each interaction is a micro-engagement that resets the attention clock. Toddlers stay engaged with a ball because each roll creates a new outcome. Your customers stay engaged with content that responds to their actions.

The Repetition Paradox

Here's where toddler attention gets weird. They hate repetition of boring things. They demand repetition of interesting things.

How Toddler Repetition Works

Every parent knows this pattern: a toddler discovers a new book and demands you read it 47 times in a row. Same book, same words, same pictures. They're completely engaged every time.

But try to feed them the same food twice? Rebellion.

What's the difference?

The psychological principle:
Toddlers seek repetition when there's still cognitive processing to do. The story has layers they're still unpacking. The rhythm has patterns they're still learning. Each repetition reveals something new even though the content is identical.

They resist repetition when there's no cognitive work left. The food tastes the same every time. There's nothing to process.

The Marketing Application

Most marketers think repetition means showing the same ad multiple times. That's not repetition. That's annoying.

Smart repetition means presenting the same core message through different cognitive angles so each exposure reveals something new.

Example:

A company sells project management software. Their core message is "finish projects 40% faster."

Bad repetition:

  • Ad 1: "Finish projects 40% faster"
  • Ad 2: "Finish projects 40% faster"
  • Ad 3: "Finish projects 40% faster"

This is the same cognitive content three times. Habituation happens after first exposure. The next two ads are noise.

Smart repetition:

  • Ad 1: "Finish projects 40% faster" (outcome claim)
  • Ad 2: "How three teams finished Q4 projects by October" (case study proof)
  • Ad 3: "The project management method that adds 8 hours to your week" (mechanism explanation)

Same message, different cognitive entry points. Each ad requires different mental processing, so habituation is delayed. The toddler principle: present the same "story" from different angles and each retelling stays engaging.

The Peek-a-Boo Economy

Toddlers lose their minds over peek-a-boo. Hide your face, reveal your face, they laugh every time. This reveals something profound about attention and anticipation.

The Psychology of Peek-a-Boo

Peek-a-boo works because of two mechanisms:

Violation of Expectation:
The face disappears (that's not supposed to happen, faces don't just vanish). This creates cognitive tension. When it reappears, the tension resolves, creating a dopamine hit.

Predictable Unpredictability:
The toddler knows the face will reappear, but doesn't know exactly when. This anticipation maintains attention. If peek-a-boo had a consistent 3-second timing, it would be less engaging. The slight variability in timing keeps it interesting.

How Brands Use This (And Mostly Don't)

Most brands are either completely predictable (boring) or completely chaotic (confusing). Neither captures sustained attention.

The winning approach: predictable rhythm with unpredictable content.

Real example:

A newsletter that sends every Tuesday at 9 AM (predictable rhythm). But the content format varies: sometimes a long essay, sometimes a curated link list, sometimes an interview, sometimes a rant (unpredictable content).

Subscribers know to expect something on Tuesday. They don't know what, exactly. This creates anticipation-based attention. Open rates for this newsletter: 58% (industry average: 21%).

Compare to a newsletter that sends "when we have something to say" (unpredictable rhythm) with a consistent format (predictable content). Open rates: 19%. No anticipation mechanism, no sustained attention.

The Launch Cadence Strategy

Apple understood this decades ago. Predictable launch events (September for iPhone, October for iPad, June for WWDC) with unpredictable product reveals. The rhythm is known, the content is mysterious. This creates sustained attention across months.

Most companies do the opposite. Random launch timing, predictable product announcements. "We'll ship features when they're ready" sounds customer-friendly, but it kills anticipation-based attention.

The Case Study: Dollar Shave Club Broke Every Rule

Let's look at how Dollar Shave Club used toddler attention principles to disrupt a category.

The Market: Razor blades, dominated by Gillette and Schick with combined 95% market share. Customers habituated to razor marketing (athlete endorsements, masculine imagery, "best a man can get" positioning).

The Problem: Complete attention habituation. Customers saw razor ads and their brains categorized them as "razor ad, already know what this is" and tuned out.

The Dollar Shave Club Approach:

Novelty Injection:
Their launch video violated every expectation for how razor companies communicate. Humor instead of machismo. Self-deprecation instead of aspiration. A CEO who looked nothing like a typical spokesman walking through a warehouse. In 90 seconds, they broke habituation with an entire category.

Result: 12,000 customers in 48 hours. Not because they had a better razor, but because they recaptured attention through radical novelty.

Interactivity Built In:
Their subscription model wasn't just a pricing strategy. It was an interaction mechanism. Customers didn't passively buy razors when they remembered. They actively managed a subscription (pause, skip, change frequency). Each interaction created an engagement touchpoint.

Smart Repetition:
They kept making videos. Each one had the same core message ("razors are overpriced, ours aren't") presented through completely different creative angles. The message repeated, the cognitive processing didn't.

Peek-a-Boo Cadence:
Monthly box deliveries created predictable rhythm. But they varied what was in each box (razors plus rotating grooming products). Customers knew a box was coming, didn't know exactly what would be inside. This anticipation created sustained engagement that traditional one-time razor purchases never achieved.

The Results:

  • Year 1: 200,000 subscribers
  • Year 5: acquired by Unilever for $1 billion
  • Market share shift: forced Gillette to drop prices 20% and launch their own subscription service

Dollar Shave Club didn't win by making better razors. They won by understanding attention psychology better than competitors who'd been in the market for 100 years.

The Technology Angle: AI-Driven Novelty

The future of attention capture isn't AI-generated content. It's AI-driven novelty optimization.

How Smart Systems Work

Habituation Detection:
AI tracks how many times an individual has seen your brand's messaging and in what contexts. When habituation thresholds are reached (typically 3-4 exposures to similar content), the system automatically switches the creative approach.

Novelty Rotation:
Instead of showing the same ad repeatedly, AI systems rotate through creative variations that present the same message through different cognitive angles. Each person sees a version optimized for where they are in the habituation cycle.

Interaction Triggers:
AI predicts when users are most likely to engage with interactive content versus passive content and serves the appropriate format. Morning scrollers get passive video. Evening browsers get interactive quizzes.

Early adopters of these systems report 40-60% improvements in attention metrics (time spent, interaction rate, recall) compared to traditional campaign approaches.

The Measurement Framework

Attention isn't about impressions or reach. It's about cognitive engagement.

Metrics That Matter

Habituation Rate:
Track how quickly your messaging becomes "invisible" to audiences. Measure attention decay across repeated exposures. Faster habituation = need for more creative variation.

Interaction Depth:
Don't just track clicks. Track how many steps into an interaction people go. Shallow interaction (one click then bounce) suggests false engagement. Deep interaction (multi-step completion) suggests genuine attention.

Repetition Retention:
Test message recall across audiences who've seen your messaging 1x, 3x, 5x times. If recall drops significantly after 3x, your repetition isn't working. You're showing the same cognitive content repeatedly.

Anticipation Signal:
For ongoing campaigns (newsletters, launch cadences, content series), track how many people proactively check for new content versus wait for notifications. High proactive checking signals strong anticipation-based attention.

One CMO calls this the "toddler test": if your audience behavior doesn't look like an engaged toddler (active exploration, repeated engagement with slight variations, anticipation for what's next), you're not capturing real attention.

The Implementation Roadmap

Here's how to apply toddler attention psychology to your marketing.

Week 1: Audit Current Habituation

  • Pull data on how many times average customer has seen your messaging
  • Survey customers: can they recall your last three marketing campaigns?
  • If recall is low despite high exposure, you've got habituation problems

Week 2: Inject Novelty

  • Take your core message and create 5 completely different ways to present it
  • Don't vary copy, vary the entire cognitive approach (story, data, visual, interactive, etc.)
  • Test which approach breaks through to habituated audiences

Week 3: Add Interaction Layers

  • Audit all marketing touchpoints: email, landing pages, ads, content
  • Identify where you can add low-friction interaction (quiz, calculator, toggle, slider)
  • Implement one interactive element per touchpoint

Week 4: Build Anticipation Rhythms

  • Choose a predictable cadence for key marketing activities
  • Add mystery/variability to the content within that cadence
  • Communicate the rhythm, not the content ("every Tuesday we share something useful" not "this Tuesday we'll share X")

Month 2-3: Optimize and Scale

  • Measure which approaches delay habituation longest
  • Rotate creative more frequently for high-exposure audiences
  • Build library of novelty approaches you can deploy systematically

What This Looks Like in Practice

Let's make this concrete.

Traditional approach (ignores attention psychology):

  • Launch campaign with one key visual and message
  • Run that campaign for 3 months across all channels
  • Measure impressions and conversions
  • Wonder why performance drops after week 2

Toddler-informed approach:

  • Launch campaign with core message expressed through 6 different creative approaches
  • Rotate approaches based on individual exposure (no one sees same creative approach more than 2x)
  • Every touchpoint includes optional interaction that deepens engagement
  • Maintain consistent posting schedule but vary content format each time
  • Track habituation metrics and refresh creative when engagement drops below baseline

The traditional approach prioritizes consistency and scale. The toddler-informed approach prioritizes sustained cognitive engagement.

The Bottom Line on Attention

Your customers' attention works exactly like a toddler's. They're drawn to novelty, engaged by interaction, sustained by smart repetition, and captured by anticipation.

Most marketing treats attention like a targeting problem. Find the right audience, show them your message, optimize for clicks. This works for first exposure. It fails for second and beyond because it ignores habituation.

The brands winning attention long-term understand that you're not competing for eyeballs. You're competing for cognitive engagement in brains that evolved to habituate to repeated stimuli.

Stop being louder. Start being newer, more interactive, and more anticipation-inducing. Watch a toddler play for an hour and you'll learn more about attention than any marketing conference will teach you.

Your customers haven't outgrown toddler attention patterns. They've just gotten better at pretending they have.

More Articles You Might Like

Ready to Transform Your Events?

Discover how eventXgames can help you create engaging experiences that drive real results.

Get Started